3 December 2017The Criminal Finances Act 2017
The prevention of tax evasion has been brought into sharp focus in the United Kingdom by the recent introduction of the Criminal Finances Act 2017 (‘the Act’), which introduces new corporate criminal offences of failing to prevent facilitation of UK and foreign tax evasion. The consequences for a corporate entity of falling foul of the Act are significant, including unlimited fines, likely disclosure to professional regulators and reputational damage. Financial institutions are particularly vulnerable to prosecution.
Getting the right cover
Getting the right cover When legislation of this nature is introduced we need to examine to what extent the insurance purchased by financial institutions may respond. Given that the Act is dealing with corporate offences, the most applicable area of coverage is Professional Indemnity (PI), also known as Civil Liability insurance. Well drafted policies typically include cover for costs incurred in defending criminal proceedings and responding to formal regulatory investigations, including those concerning failures to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion (provided that such proceedings and investigations relate to the insured entity’s provision of professional and financial services).
However, there are two provisos to bear in mind in relation to the Act. Firstly, all PI policies include some form of dishonesty exclusion, which will typically apply once fraudulent or dishonest acts by the insured entity have been established by a court or other decision making body. There is, therefore, a potential for any costs incurred by the insured entity to be recouped by insurers if the insured entity has been successfully prosecuted under the Act. However, the insurer will be liable for the costs of a successful defence. Secondly, all PI policies exclude criminal fines and under most jurisdictions there is a general legal principle which prevents companies and individuals negating the deterrent effect of fines for wrongful conduct by insuring their exposure. As such, we do not believe that any fines levied against an insured entity under the Act will be covered. For further information on the insurability of fines, please refer to our June 2017 bulletin, ‘A Solution to a Fine Mess?’
It is also worth considering Directors’ & Officers’ (D&O) Liability insurance in this context. If a corporate entity is successfully prosecuted, then it seems possible that its directors and officers could face claims by shareholders and others for shortcomings in failing to prevent the corporate entity’s facilitation of tax evasion.
Reputational Risk insurance, which provides coverage for certain losses resulting from damage to a corporate entity’s reputation, could also be relevant given that it can be a useful tool in dealing with the reputational fallout from incidents such as prosecution under the Act.
What makes us different
We believe there’s no substitute for reliability. Financial Institutions shouldn’t have to compromise between great service and a great renewal result. Gallagher combines the strong balance sheet and market influence of one of the world’s largest brokers with a small broker’s service mentality.
With over 600 clients spread across 50 countries and territories, our Financial Institutions team has capabilities in a range of niche industry subsectors. Our broad expertise means we can look at insurance differently, offering clients year-round insight and a service that is reassuringly predictable, so they can leave the risks to us.
If you would like to discuss any of the above further then please contact your Account Executive or email Thomas Falcon (Thomas_falcon@ajg.com)